When I was hiring people for Gawker, I wanted to hire people I really respected because I was afraid of people kind of stepping into the firing line of the internet by signing up for new Gawker. Those were always the decisions where the women on the staff felt like they really weren’t involved with them or to kind of look the other way, because there’s this macho energy that was behind them. It probably was a subconscious thing going into this Gawker that I hired mostly all women because the misogyny was such a powerful and noxious force when I was there. My mission statement going into this Gawker was to take the parts I really loved about the time I work there that don’t really get remembered because they’re not a sex tape, and make those into the cornerstone of the new Gawker. And I edited some of my favorite pieces I ever did at Gawker. And then the rest of Gawker was funny and smart and provocative. The Gawker 2.0 missionĪn important thing to know and to realize about old Gawker is that the lawsuits and the really incendiary stuff, and, you know, the misogyny that was only about - not to minimize it - 20% of what Gawker was. Here are a few highlights from the conversation, which have been edited for length and clarity. In this conversation, Finnegan discusses how she’s crafted her management style to addresses these issues while also building Gawker 2.0 into a brand that she and her team is proud of. This is the third episode of a four-part series called “The Modern Newsroom Leader,” which features newly appointed editors-in-chief as they navigate industry challenges including staffers dealing with burnout, unsteady financial businesses and prioritizing diversity, equity and inclusion in hiring practices. It was an earlier iteration of the way digital media worked and I didn’t want to go back to that Gawker,” said Finnegan on the latest episode of the Digiday Podcast. “ such a loaded place and the time I was there was so dramatic and tumultuous. Her work is cut out for her: Gawker ended its run after a lawsuit was brought against its founder Nick Denton for publishing those tapes. This time, however, she is determined to right the wrongs of the past, which she considers to be internal factors including misogyny and bro culture as well as misguided editorial decisions, such as publishing illicit sex tapes. Then after a year of unemployment that began at the start of the pandemic, she jumped at the chance to return and relaunch the new Gawker under BDG’s ownership. About a year after it shut down, she led one of BDG’s newly acquired sites The Outline before that too was shuttered in 2020. She was formerly the features editor during Gawker’s heyday (when it published notable pieces like “ Billionaire Pervert Jeffrey Epstein and His Famous Friends: A Primer” and “ People Keep Telling Us About Kevin Spacey’s Aggressive Love for Men“). Three years later, Gawker is back up and running (after an initial false start with a different cast of characters) under editor-in-chief Leah Finnegan.įinnegan isn’t new to the brand - or BDG. But rumblings of the site’s return - and its snippy attitude - came in July 2018 when BDG CEO Bryan Goldberg paid just under $1.5 million for the defunct website. When the bankrupt Gawker shut its doors in 2016, it seemed unlikely that the site known for snarky opinions, celebrity gossip and haughty critiques would return. Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Stitcher | Google Play | Spotify
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |